The Annunciation

The Annunciation

Titles

The Annunciation

[cda 2021]

Triptych [central panel]: The Annunciation

[cda 2023]

Painting on fir wood (Abies sp.)

Medium

Painting on fir wood (Abies sp.)

[Blumenroth, Heydenreich, unpublished examination report, 07.01.2024]

The panel depicts the Annunciation and shows the Virgin in the foreground at the left, kneeling in front of a prayer stool with a vase of lilies beside it. She raises her hands in surprise at the arrival of the angel Gabriel who enters from the right. The Holy Ghost

The panel depicts the Annunciation and shows the Virgin in the foreground at the left, kneeling in front of a prayer stool with a vase of lilies beside it. She raises her hands in surprise at the arrival of the angel Gabriel who enters from the right. The Holy Ghost is depicted as a dove, hovering above them. The figures are arranged in a simple architectural interior representing the Virgin’s bedchamber. A window in the rear wall looks out over a mountainous landscape with a castle.

[cda 2021]

Attributions
Lucas Cranach the Elder and Workshop
Hans Kemmer ? (in Cranach the Elder's workshop)

Attributions

Lucas Cranach the Elder and Workshop
Hans Kemmer ? (in Cranach the Elder's workshop)

[Lucas Cranach the Elder and workshop (Hans Kemmer?) Blumenroth, Heydenreich, unpublished examination report, 07.01.2024]

Production date
about 1515 - 1517

Production date

about 1515 - 1517

[Blumenroth, Heydenreich, unpublished examination report, 07.01.2024]

Dimensions
Dimensions of support: 122.5/123.2 x 86.5 cm

Dimensions

  • Dimensions of support: 122.5/123.2 x 86.5 cm

  • Dimensions including frame: 139.8 x 98.3 cm

  • [Blumenroth, Heydenreich, unpublished examination report, 07.01.2024]

Inscriptions and Labels
  • at the top: 'AVEMARIA GRACIA PLENA DOMINVS TECVM BENEDICTATV IN MVLIERIBVS: // ET BENEDICTVS FRVCTVS VENTRISTVI IHESVS CHRIST AME.'

  • at …

Inscriptions and Labels

Inscriptions, Badges:

    • at the top:
  • 'AVEMARIA GRACIA PLENA DOMINVS TECVM BENEDICTATV IN MVLIERIBVS: // ET BENEDICTVS FRVCTVS VENTRISTVI IHESVS CHRIST AME.'

    • at the bottom:
  • '.ECCE ANCILLA DOMINI FIAT // .MICHI SECVNDVM VERBVM TVVM.'

Stamps, Seals, Labels:

  • Verso of the frame, top member:

    • rectangular paper label with a blue border band and handwritten in ink: 'Grünewald // Dreiteiliges Flügelaltarbild // 979'
    • white paper label
  • Verso of the panel: - on the forth vertical cradle member:

  • rectangular paper label with decorative blue border and illegible text

    • on the fifth vertical cradle member:
  • handwritten: '531'

    • on the sixth vertical member:
  • white paper label

Owner
Private Collection
Repository
Private Collection
CDA ID
PRIVATE_NONE-P509
FR (1978) Nr.
FR-none
Persistent Link
https://lucascranach.org/en/PRIVATE_NONE-P509/

Provenance

  • Galerie Miethke, Vienna
    [handwritten on the reverse of a b/w photograph, Koepplin Archive]

  • Swiss private collection

  • Auction Stuker, Bern, 1972

  • Galerie Miethke, Vienna

  • sold at Koller, Zürich, 31.03.2023, Lot 3014
    [Kollerauktionen online, accessed 27.03.2024]

Literature

Reference on page Catalogue Number Figure / Plate
Auct. Cat. Zürich 2023 20-27 3014
EditorKoller, Zürich
TitleAuktionskatalog Gemälde Alte Meister & des 19. Jh., Zeichnungen und alte Grafik, Auktion 31.032023
Place of PublicationZürich
Year of Publication2023

Research History / Discussion

The main features of the support, including the type of wood, the width of the boards, the fibre applications and the ground can be found on other works by Lucas Cranach the Elder's workshop from around 1515-20. The size and proportions of the central panel are close to the standard ‘E’ format frequently used in Cranach's workshop.

The composition of the underdrawing is like that found on other works from the workshop of Lucas Cranach the Elder. The identified pigments were frequently used in Cranach's workshop as well as in other painters' workshops in the early modern period and more recently. The gilding techniques and paint application also correspond to practices in the Wittenberg workshop of Lucas Cranach the Elder in the years around 1515-20. The materials and construction suggest that the central panel and both wing panels were conceived and realised as a unit, i.e. as a winged retable that was probably created in the Wittenberg workshop of Lucas Cranach the Elder about 1515-17. [...]

However, the formal and stylistic characteristics of the underdrawing and painterly execution differ from other works that are unanimously considered to be autograph works by Lucas Cranach the Elder. [...] Some painterly details, such as the flesh paint and the robes, including the brocade patterns, the angel's wings, the border of the canopy, the foliage, the inscriptions in Renaissance capitalis with overhanging capitals show great similarities to works that have now been attributed to Hans Kemmer, who worked in Cranach’s workshop from around 1515 to around 1521.

This leads to the conclusion that the triptych is a high-quality and very well-preserved work by Lucas Cranach the Elder and his workshop, exhibiting feature that suggest it was predominantly executed by Hans Kemmer.

[Blumenroth, Heydenreich, unpublished examination report, 07.01.2024]

  • The Annunciation, about 1515 - 1517

Images

Compare images
  • overall
  • overall
  • overall
  • overall
  • overall
  • reverse
  • reverse
  • reverse
  • reverse
  • reverse
  • irr
  • x_radiograph
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail
  • detail

Technical studies

07.01.2024Technical examination / Scientific analysis

  • Infrared reflectography
  • X-radiography
  • UV-light photography
  • Instrumental material analysis
  • Stereomicroscopy

Support

The following examination methods were employed:

Stereomicroscopy, XRF analysis (Thermo Scientific - Niton XL3t GOLDD+), UV- light , X-radiography (Oehm and Rehbein, Leonardo/ Varex-Perkin Elmer XRPad2 4336) and Infrared reflectography (Osiris 900 - 1700 nm)

The central panel consists of seven vertically aligned, butt-joined boards.The wood species was identified as fir (Abies sp.) under the microscope. The X-radiograph shows several knots in the wood. A bevel with a width of c. 10-15 mm (top), c. 5 mm (left), c. 10-13 mm (bottom), c. 13-14 mm (right) is preserved on the reverse along the edge of the panel.

The X-radiograph also shows that a fiberous material was applied to the recto of the central panel in three strips across the centre and the top ans bottom edges at right angles to the alignment of the boards before the ground was applied.

Ground and Imprimatura

The ground is a white layer containing calcium. A barbe has been preserved at both the top and bottom c. 10 - 13 mm from the edge of the panel. An incised line runs parallel to the barbe along the top of the panel. The ground has an uneven edge at the left and extends to the edge of the panel on the right. On the reverse of the centre panel, bevels the left and right are also primed in white.

In several areas, the X-radiography reveals bubbles in the ground layer. The X-radiograph doesn't show any evidence to suggest the presence of a lead-white imprimatura.

Underdrawing

The infrared reflectogram shows underdrawing lines executed using a liquid grey-black medium and brush. The partial use of a pen cannot be ruled out. Contours and essential details appear to be outlined with sweeping confident lines. In several areas of the centre panel, particularly in the robes and the angel's right foot, volume and shadow are acheived with parallel and cross-hatching strokes.

In several areas there are slight deviations between the compositional layout in the drawings and the painted execution: for example, the base of the lectern in the centre panel was initially created with a foreshortened perspective and the castle in the background was initially drawn without a large round tower. Mary's fingers were longer in the underdrawing.

Paint Layers and Gilding

The following elements were detected by XRF and after comparing their optical characteristics were following pigments were identified:

Central panel

Yellow MP1: Pb, Ca, Fe, Sn, Hg, Mn, Sr, (Zn/ Cu)

Pb: lead white; Pb/ Sn: lead tin yellow; Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Fe/Mn: iron oxide/ ochre (?); Hg: vermilion; Sr: component of 'chalk' (?); Zn: Zinc white / retouch (?); Cu: Copper blue / green / siccative (?)

Blue MP2: Cu, Ca, Pb, Fe, Hg, Sr

Cu: copper blue; Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Pb: lead white; Fe: iron oxide/ ochre (?); Hg: vermilion; Sr: component of 'chalk' (?)

Red MP3: Ca, Pb, Fe, Hg, Sr

Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Pb: lead white/ red lead (?); Fe: iron oxide/ ochre (?); Hg: vermilion; Sr: component of 'chalk' (?)

Blue MP 4: Pb, Cu, Ca, Fe, Sr, Mn

Pb: lead white; Cu: copper-containing blue; Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Fe/ Mn: iron oxide/ ochre (?); Sr: component of 'chalk' (?)

Gold MP 5: Ca, Fe, Au, Ti, Cu, Sr (Mn)

Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Fe/ Ti/ Mn: iron oxide/ ochre/ bolus (?); Au: gold; Cu: accompanying element/ copper-containing blue/ green/ siccative (?); Ti: titanium dioxide (?); Sr: component of "chalk" (?)

Flesh paint: MP 6: Pb, Ca, Fe, Hg, Sr

Pb: lead white; Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Fe: iron oxide/ ochre (?); Hg: vermilion; Sr: component of 'chalk' (?)

Red MP7: Ca, Pb, Hg, Fe, Sr

Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Pb: white lead; Hg: vermilion; Fe: iron oxide/ ochre (?); Sr: component of 'chalk' (?)

Green MP 8: Pb, Cu, Ca, Sn, Fe, Sr

Pb: lead white; Cu: copper green; Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Pb/ Sn: lead-tin yellow; Fe: Iron oxide/ ochre (?); Sr: Component of "chalk" (?)

Blue MP 9: Cu, Pb, Ca, Fe, Mn, Sr

Cu: copper-containing blue; Pb: Lead white; Ca: Chalk/gypsum (?); Fe/ Mn: iron oxide/ochre (?); Sr: component of 'chalk' (?)

Blue MP 10: Cu, Pb, Ca, Fe, Sr, Sn

Cu: copper blue; Pb: lead white; Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Fe: iron oxide/ ochre (?); Pb/ Sn: lead tin yellow (?); Sr: component of 'chalk' (?)

Orange MP 11: Ca, Pb, Fe, Hg, Sn, Sr

Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Pb: lead white; Fe: iron oxide/ ochre (?); Hg: vermilion; Pb/ Sn: lead tin yellow; Sr: component of 'chalk' (?)

Gold type MP 12: Ca, Pb, Cu, Fe, Zn, Ag, Au, Sr

Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Pb: white lead; Cu/ Zn: brass (?); Zn: Zinc white (?); Fe: iron oxide/ochre (?); Au: gold; Ag: silver (Ag/Au: Zwischgold); Sr: component of 'chalk' (?)

Ground front MP 13: Ca, Fe, Pb (Mn)

Ca: chalk/ gypsum ; Fe/ Mn: iron oxide/ ochre (?); Pb: white lead

Ground right MP 14: Ca, Ba, Pb, Sr, Hg

Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Ba: barium sulphate; Pb: white lead/ red lead (?); Hg: vermilion; Sr: component of 'chalk' (?)

Gold MP 15: Ca, Fe, Pb, Au, Ti, Sr, (Cu)

Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Fe/ Ti: iron oxide/ ochre/ bolus (?); Pb: lead white; Au: gold; Ti: titanium dioxide (?); Cu: copper-containing blue/ green/ siccative (?); Sr: component of 'chalk'(?)

Gold inscription MP 16: Ca, Pb, Fe, Ag, Au, Sr

Ca: chalk/ gypsum (?); Pb: lead white; Fe: iron oxide/ ochre; (?); Au: gold; Ag: silver (Ag/Au: Zwischgold); Sr: component of 'chalk' (?)

The following pigments were identified in the paint layers: Lead white, lead-tin yellow, yellow ochre, red iron oxide pigment, vermilion, azurite and copper-containing green pigment. Gold and Zwischgold used as metal leaf. Brass powder (gold bronze) was used for retouching.

See the unpublished examination report for a more detailed description of the painting process.

[Blumenroth, Heydenreich unpublished examination report, 07.01.2024].

  • examined by Diana Blumenroth
  • examined by Gunnar Heydenreich

Condition Reports

Date07.01.2024

The panels are in a slightly damaged and relatively stable condition.

Support:

There are woodworm channels (inactive) and several vertical cracks in the wooden supports, visible on the back of the centre panel and on the outer sides of the wing panels. There are narrow splits on the left edge of the centre panel. In raking light, the boards appear slightly warped. The narrower width of the bevel on the left edge suggests that the panel was subsequently trimmed by c. 1 cm. The original size of the panel was therefore c. 123.2 x 87.5 cm. In more recent times the panel was thinned on the reverse to c. 12 mm, stabilised with a cradle and painted black in the areas between the cradle members.

Paint layers:

A

fine craquelure.

Losses treated in several phases.

Flaking and small losses in the area of the headscarf and the mantle of the Mother of Sorrows on the right wing.

Metal:

The gold haloes appear abraded, and have been reworked several times. Some of this new gilding has since been removed. The inscriptions and the dove's halo have been retouched using black paint and bronze powder.

Varnish:

All the panels exhibit several applications of varnish.

Framing:

In the modern frame the wing paintings appear to be mounted too low in relation to the central panel. In addition the frame members cover a few square centimetres of the picture surface at the top and bottom of the wing panels.

[Blumenroth, Heydenreich, unpublished examination report, 07.01.2024]

  • examined by Gunnar Heydenreich
  • examined by Diana Blumenroth

Citing from the Cranach Digital Archive

Entry with author
<author's name>, 'The Annunciation', <title of document, data entry or image>. [<Date of document or image>], in: Cranach Digital Archive, https://lucascranach.org/en/PRIVATE_NONE-P509/ (Accessed {{dateAccessed}})
Entry with no author
'The Annunciation', <title of document, data entry or image>. [<Date of document, entry or image>], in: Cranach Digital Archive, https://lucascranach.org/en/PRIVATE_NONE-P509/ (Accessed {{dateAccessed}})

Help us to improve the Cranach Digital Archive.

Please contact us, if you have noticed a mistake.